Page 112 - Heavenly Signs III by Mel Gable
P. 112

110


              Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was informed that Pakistan has dispersed its nuclear
              weapons throughout the country.  It would require an increase in security so that these weapons would not fall
              into terrorist hands. Her comments came as new satellite images suggested Pakistan is increasing its capacity to
              produce plutonium as a fuel for atomic bombs. The institute has also claimed that Pakistan has built two more
              nuclear reactors at Khoshab increasing the number of plutonium producing reactors to three. So, what has the
              United States done to protect its security against Pakistan? Isn’t this a responsibility and decision of the
                                                                       187
              Commander and Chief to protect this nation from its enemies?
              The President of the United States sent special trained forces into Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden. Was this to
              gain revenge? Nevertheless, killing one man doesn’t render the threat dormant. We went over to Iraq to seek and
              find weapons of mass-destruction but found none. However, we have known since the turn of the century that
              Pakistan possesses weapons of mass-destruction. Since the 9/11 attack, we have know the location of the
              terrorist training camps. We know where the fissionable material production is within Pakistan. The government
              of the United States selected to engage in war in both Afghanistan and Iraq.  But not to engage in Pakistan,
              where the Islamic terrorist camps are and where the weapons of mass-destruction are known to be. Does this
              make sense logically? What is our country thinking? We with our tax dollars pay billions of dollars for
              intelligence. Do we not believe that this United States could come under nuclear attack? How could that be?  We
              have seen who our enemies are in this world. We have been at war in Afghanistan, the neighbor of Pakistan.
              Should we have done something with Pakistan’s nuclear weapons while we were there? Was this a political move?

              At the “World Economic Forum in 2013,” former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger addressed the ever
              growing world crisis. Kissinger spoke about Syria, nuclear proliferation, the Middle East in the aftermath of the
              Israel-Palestinian conflict and more.


              On nuclear powers: “Pakistan has demonstrated enormous sophistication in developing nuclear weapons and could become a
              source of proliferation in the region.”

              The current conflict in Syria, Kissinger said, can be resolved if the U.S. and Russia were to sponsor an agreement
              that other countries would also back. It was another Islamic nation, Egypt, which intervened in the Israeli-
              Palestinian fighting. But, missiles continue to come from Syria to the land of Israel.


              On Iran: “The Iranians need to understand that if they keep using the negotiations to gain time to complete a nuclear program the
                                                                                                  188
              situation will become extremely dangerous … The danger is that nuclear weapons become almost conventional.”

              Kissinger sees Iran, Syria and Pakistan as potential threats to peace in this world. What has our government
              decided to do about these threats? Obama’s administration seems to be ignoring the issues and has withdrawn its
              troops from the Middle East. With the sequester cuts that have taken effect on March 2013, it has cut 85 billion
              dollars in government funding. The important issue is the impact it will have on the U.S. Military with a 47
              billion dollar cut. The Republican Party has allowed these cuts to come, since the Administration is not
              concerned about the U.S. growing deficit. The German government is so concerned about the U.S. deficit that it
              is taking its gold reserves back to its own country. German’s gold reserves have been held in France, England
              and U.S. since World War II as part of the repatriation. Frankfurt is in the process of taking back 1,433 tons of
                                                                                                             189
              gold held by England, 412 tons of gold in Paris as well as approximately 1650 tons of gold held by the U.S.



              187  "Pakistan Builds 2 More Reactors: ISIS". Apakistannews.com. 2009-04-24.
              188  Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY 8:39a.m. EST January 24, 2013, and Robert Morley, The Philadelphia Trumpet, April 2013
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117